Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼Ò¾Æ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷ÀÇ °æ±¸ Åõ¿©¿Í ±ÙÀ° Åõ¿©¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÁøÁ¤ È¿°úÀÇ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF ORAL MIDAZOLAM AND INTRAMUSCULAR MIDAZOLAM IN SEDATING YOUNG PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 33±Ç 1È£ p.53 ~ 61
¹ÎÀ¯Áø, ±èÁ¾¼ö, À¯½ÂÈÆ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÎÀ¯Áø ( Min Yu-Jin ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁ¾¼ö ( Kim Jong-Soo ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
À¯½ÂÈÆ ( Yoo Seung-Hoon ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷Àº ¼Ò¾Æ ȯÀÚÀÇ ÁøÁ¤½Ã ÈçÈ÷ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¾à¹°·Î¼­ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀÌ ¶Ù¾î³ª°í »ç¿ëÀÌ Æí¸®Çϸç Åõ¿© ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÏ´Ù. ¿©·¯ Åõ¿© ¹æ¹ý Áß, ÁÖ·Î »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿© ¹æ¹ýÀº µ¿ÅëÀ» À¯¹ßÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ¾î¸°ÀÌÀÇ Ä¡°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °øÆ÷¸¦ °¡Áß½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©ÀÇ ÀÌ·± ´ÜÁ¡À» ¿ÏÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ¿ë·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷ °æ±¸ Åõ¿©ÀÇ ÁøÁ¤ È¿°ú¸¦ ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©½ÃÀÇ ÁøÁ¤ È¿°ú¿Í ºñ±³ Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

ÃÑ 12¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ½ÇÇè´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌÁß ¸Í°Ë¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ µÎ ¹øÀÇ ³»¿øÁß ÀÓÀÇ·Î ÇÑ ¹øÀº Midazolam 0.75 mg/kgÀ» °æ±¸ Åõ¿©ÇÏ°í, ÇÑ ¹øÀº ¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷ 0.3 mg/kgÀ» ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©ÇÏ¿© Ä¡·áÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Ä¡·á°úÁ¤ µ¿¾È ȯÀÚÀÇ »ý¡ÈÄ(¸»ÃÊ µ¿¸ÆÇ÷ »ê¼Ò Æ÷È­µµ, ½É¹Ú¼ö)¿Í Çൿ¾ç»óÀ» Ohio State University Behavior rating scale°ú Automated Counting SystemÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

»ý¡ÈÄÀÇ °æ¿ì ¾ç ±º ¸ðµÎ Á¤»ó¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÁ¤µÈ ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÑ Çൿ¾ç»ó(Q:Quiet)ÀÇ ºñÀ²ÀÌ ¾ç ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëºÎºÐ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç ¾ç ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05). º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷À» ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©ÇÑ ±º°ú °æ±¸ Åõ¿©ÇÑ ±º ¸ðµÎ ÁøÁ¤ È¿°ú°¡ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç ¾ç ±º°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0,05).

When routine behavior control is impossible, midazolam is often used for sedation. because it has wide margin of safety, relatively few side-effects and multiple route of administration. Although intramuscular administration of all administration route is frequently used. it is a major source of anxiety, discomfort, and trauma in children. To the contrary, oral administration of midazolam is easily administered and accepted by children. But, it¡¯s therapeutic drug concentration has not been established. The purpose of this study was to compare sedation effect and physiologic parameter of oral midazolam which palliate demer its of intramuscular administration in sedating young pediatric patients with intramuscular midazolam

Twelve negative children, mean age 62.5 months. who needed at least two separate restorative visits, requiring local anesthesia participated in this study. On every visit, one of the following 2 different sedative regimen was given : (1) 0.30mg/kg midazolam by intramuscular administration (2) 0.75mg/kg by oral administration. Physiologic parameter(oxygen saturation, heart rate) was recorded by ten procedure and behavior was videotaped and rated using Ohio State University Behavior Rating Scale and Automated Counting System by one investigator, blind to administration route.

The analyzed sedative effect of oral midazolam resulted in good sedative effect, comparing to intramuscular route. And there is no statistically difference between oral and intramuscular administration of midazolam(p>0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶÷ÀÇ ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©;¹Ì´ÙÁ¹¶øÀÇ °æ±¸ Åõ¿©;»ý¡ÈÄ;Çൿ¾ç»ó
Oral midazolam;Intramuscular midazolam;Physiologic parameter;Behavior

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI